![]() ![]() But the change in focus has made v5 DSP Quattro much harder to use for basic editing duties. It’s definitely very nice looking and modern. I regularly edit 200-300 or more drum samples in a sitting. Yes, but for actual “audio editing” of samples v5 is much more difficult now because it forces you to create a project when opening an audio file. you have to set up for it instead of the default which is a mastering session. there's just an extra layer to get to basic simple file editing. ![]() it wouldn't overlap w/what the new thing (Triumph) does at all.Įdit: looks like the company is in transitionĪlso, DSP Quattro new version is good. it's not even a relevant product/follow up to waveedit imo. the thing they replaced with is just awful imo. it has one bug that drives me crazy and added up to more work. i still have a copy on the HD somewhere but haven't used it in a while. The new version has more layers and is more angled to mastering.Īudiofile Engineering wave edit was great. V4.4 is still much quicker.Īnd yes, it’s rough going nowadays trying to find a decent audio editor I think he kind of kill it with the new version. You might as well give audacity a shot and see if it meets all your needs.ĭSP Quattro here too, but the older v4.4. some editors went heavily towards mastering and as a result become cluttered and clunky for basic quick editing. There's no one solution for all the audio editing tasks these days. Ignatius wrote: i also use DSP Quattro still.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |